Industry Report
VEEVA PULSE FIELD TRENDS REPORT Q4 2024
Trends Improving HCP Engagement and Accelerating
Treatment Adoption
³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse ???? ???, ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? HCP(Healthcare Professional, ?? ???)?? ??? ????, ??? ???? ????, ??? ??? ???? ??? ??????. ??? HCP?? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????.
?? ???? ??(KOL)1? ?? ??? ??, ??? ? ??? ?? ???? ???, 44%? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ??? ???? ????. ???? ??, ??? ?? ??, ??? ???? ?? ? ?? ??? ??? ???? HCP? ??? ????? ??? ????.
"?? ??? ?? ??? ????, ??? ? ??, ??? ?? ? ?? ??? ? ???? ??? ??? ???. ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?????. ?, ?? ? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??, ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ????."
¡ª Dr. Vital Hevia, ???? ?? ? ?? ?? ???, ROC Clinic and HM Hospitals
?? ? ? ??? ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse ????? ??? ?? HCP? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????.
Dan Rizzo
VP, Global Head of Business Consulting
1 ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Survey of 50 Key Opinion Leaders, September-November 2024.
Pre-launch scientific outreach is accelerating treatment
adoption by 40%
Prioritizing investments in targeted scientific activities with the right experts speeds treatment adoption. A U.S.-based study of oncology drugs showed
that biopharmas who invested more in pre-launch scientific activities saw
40% faster treatment adoption than companies that invested less. Field medical engagement with key opinion leaders prior to launch also improves treatment adoption by 50%.
Where companies make investments matters. In the same study, congress activity had the strongest influence on speed of adoption, outpacing the influence of social media, publications, guidelines, and clinical trials. Medical teams should also focus engagement on digitally savvy, early-career HCPs, who are four times more likely to adopt a new treatment.
Synchronized sales and marketing is
improving prescribing behavior
Close and timely coordination of field engagements and HCP digital advertising ¡ª or synchronization ¡ª increases marketing effectiveness by 23%. But 65% of HCP engagements are not synchronized.
Coordinating sales and marketing touchpoints can close the gap, strengthening HCP engagement, increasing scientific understanding, and improving prescribing behavior. In one case study, a rep call was 30% more likely to result in a prescription if it was followed by digital exposure within 10 days.2 Another showed that HCPs exposed to digital ads within 10 days after a speaker program were 25% more likely to prescribe.2
¡°A person¡¯s capacity to ingest content that is not relevant,
not timely, and not delivered in a way that they want to receive
it is probably something like zero. And our job as marketers is
to figure out how to get as close as possible to relevant, timely, and needed content at the right time.¡±
¡ª Erica Taylor, PhD, Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, Genentech
Connected engagement across sales, marketing, and medical3
2 Source: U.S. ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Crossix case studies and ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse data, 2023 and 2024.
3 Simplified representation of the connected engagement model
Timely, relevant engagement is mitigating declining access
HCP access declined from 60% to 45% from 2023 to 2024 in the U.S., marking a return to prepandemic
levels. Access levels vary significantly by specialty ¡ª oncology, internal medicine, and psychiatry are the
most difficult to reach. And HCPs are highly selective, with 50% of accessible HCPs limiting engagement
to three or fewer companies.
Connected sales, marketing, and medical teams are mitigating challenging access by extending
conversations, responding quickly to HCPs¡¯ needs, and improving treatment adoption. This commercial
model requires shared data, connected systems, aligned incentives, and a unified understanding of
the customer.
¡°How do we get a better understanding of our customers and make sure
that our messages and the way we approach people is relevant, meaningful,
and treating them as the unique individuals they are, rather than just saying,
¡®I¡¯m going to use the same five slides.¡¯¡±
¡ª Kieron Scrutton, SVP Medical Affairs Digital & Technology, and Tech Governance Risk
and Compliance, GSK
Connect with ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Business Consulting to learn how ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse data can improve HCP
engagement for your field team.
Global and Regional Trends
This report highlights global and regional field engagement trends from ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse data gathered between October
2023 and December 2024. ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse data is sourced from ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ¡¯s aggregated CRM activity, including field
engagement stats from all instances of ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM globally. In this report, comparisons in trending charts are year
over year, Q4 2023 to Q4 2024, while non-trending charts contain quarter-over-quarter comparisons, Q3 2024 to Q4
2024.
Global trends*
Figure 1: Channel mix evolution, global
Figure 2: Channel mix, global
Global field team activity
Weekly activity per user by engagement channel
Figure 3: Activity by region, global
Figure 4: Activity by user type, global
Global engagement quality
Consolidation of key quality metrics
Figure 5: Approved email volume, global
Figure 6: Content usage by channel, global
Figure 7: ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting duration, global
*This quarter¡¯s global trends report omits data from China.
U.S. market trends
Figure 8: Channel mix evolution, U.S.
Figure 9: Channel mix, U.S.
U.S. field team activity
Weekly activity per user by engagement channel
Figure 10: Activity, U.S.
Figure 11: Activity by user type, U.S.
U.S. engagement quality
Consolidation of key quality metrics
Figure 12: Approved email volume, U.S.
Figure 13: Content usage by channel, U.S.
Figure 14: ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting duration, U.S.
Europe market trends
Figure 15: Channel mix evolution, Europe
Figure 16: Channel mix, Europe
Europe field team activity
Weekly activity per user by engagement channel
Figure 17: Activity by country, EU5
Figure 18: Activity by user type, Europe
Europe engagement quality
Consolidation of key quality metrics
Figure 19: Approved email volume, Europe
Figure 20: Content usage by channel, Europe
Figure 21: ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting duration, Europe
Asia market trends
Figure 22: Channel mix evolution, Asia
Figure 23: Channel mix, Asia
Asia field team activity
Weekly activity per user by engagement channel
Figure 24: Activity by country, Asia
Figure 25: Activity by user type, Asia
Asia engagement quality
Consolidation of key quality metrics
Figure 26: Approved email volume, Asia
Figure 27: Content usage by channel, Asia
Figure 28: ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting duration, Asia
Latin America market trends
Figure 29: Channel mix evolution, Latin America
Figure 30: Channel mix, Latin America
Latin America field team activity
Weekly activity per user by engagement channel
Figure 31: Activity by country, Latin America
Figure 32: Activity by user type, Latin America
Latin America engagement quality
Consolidation of key quality metrics
Figure 33: Approved email volume, Latin America
Figure 34: Content usage by channel, Latin America
Figure 35: ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting duration, Latin America
Appendix: Data dictionary
Metric definitions
- Channel mix evolution over time: Weekly ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM activity volume broken down by the channel of engagement (in-person, phone, video, email, chat or text)
- Channel mix: Total ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM activity volume broken out by engagement channel percentage, calculated using percent change during the specified period
- Weekly activities per user: The average weekly number of ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM activities submitted per number of users active in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM
- Approved email volume: The average weekly volume of approved emails sent via ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM, calculated using percent change during the specified period
- Email open rate: Percentage of approved emails opened at least once out of all approved emails sent via ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM
- Email click rate: Percentage of approved emails clicked at least once out of all approved emails sent via ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM
- In-person % CLM usage: Percentage of in-person engagements that leveraged content in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM
- Video % CLM usage: Percentage of video engagements that leveraged content in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM
- ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting % CLM usage: Percentage of ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meetings that leveraged content in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM
- ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meeting duration: The average duration of ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage meetings in minutes
Engagement channel definitions
- In-person: Submitted calls with a CRM Standard Metrics call channel value of ¡®in-person¡¯
- Phone: Submitted calls with a CRM Standard Metrics call channel value of ¡®phone¡¯
- Video: ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage calls and video calls via other platforms that are then recorded as calls in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM with a Standard Metrics call channel value of ¡®video¡¯
- Email: Approved emails and emails sent via other platforms that are then recorded as calls in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM with a Standard Metrics call channel value of ¡®email¡¯
- Chat or text: Submitted calls with a CRM Standard Metrics call channel value of ¡®chat or text¡¯
User type definitions
- Sales: Users that have been classified with the ¡®sales¡¯ value in the CRM Standard Metrics user type field
- Key account manager: Users that have been classified with the ¡®key account manager¡¯ value in the CRM Standard Metrics user type field
- Medical: Users that have been classified with the ¡®medical¡¯ value in the CRM Standard Metrics user type field
Region definitions
- Global: All markets globally. This quarter¡¯s global trends report omits data from China.
- Europe: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Aruba, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, French Polynesia, Georgia, Germany,
Greece, Greenland, Guadeloupe, Guernsey, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Jersey, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia,
Malta, Martinique, Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Caledonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom - Asia: Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Indonesia, Japan,
Kazakhstan, Republic of Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nauru, Nepal, New Zealand, Philippines,
Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam - Latin America: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa
Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico,
Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela
Methodology
The ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse Field Trends Report is a quarterly industry benchmark for global and regional healthcare
professional (HCP) engagement across the life sciences industry. The findings are based on:
- Approximately 600 million annual global field activities captured in ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM and ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ CRM Engage.
- Marketing effectiveness data from ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Crossix. Crossix connects anonymized health data on 300+ million patients to media data to measure the impact of direct-to-consumer and HCP marketing investments in the U.S.
- Anonymous patient longitudinal claims data from ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Compass Patient covering dispensed prescriptions, procedures, and diagnoses from 300+ million patients.
- 4+ million profiles containing publications, clinical trials, conferences, associations, guidelines, grants, payments, social media, news mentions, and patient mix by disease and drug class from ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Link Key People in 85+ countries and all major therapeutic areas.
- Global reference data of HCPs, healthcare organizations, and affiliations from ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ OpenData, containing addresses, emails, specialties, demographics, and compliance data (license information and industry identifiers) in 100+ countries.
The ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse Field Trends Report delivers insights that inform the industry and help field teams align their
strategy to key market trends for improved commercial success. The global ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Business Consulting team also
helps customers inform their strategies using industry benchmarking with ³Ô¹Ï±¬ÁÏ Pulse data.